Association of respiratory viral detection with complex febrile seizures and hospitalisation in children after the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective observational study - Summary - MDSpire

Association of respiratory viral detection with complex febrile seizures and hospitalisation in children after the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective observational study

  • By

  • Ho-Young Song

  • So-Hyun Paek

  • Jae-Hyun Kwon

  • Soo Hyun Park

  • Min-Jung Kim

  • Young-Hoon Byun

  • Jin Hee Kim

  • Sung-Ha Kim

  • June 10, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate associations between respiratory viral detection and clinical outcomes in children with febrile seizures (FS).

Approach:
  • Study Design: Retrospective analysis of children aged 6–60 months with FS who underwent multiplex respiratory virus RT-PCR in a tertiary pediatric emergency department from April 2023 to March 2025.
  • Statistical Analysis: Logistic regression was used to assess associations of individual viruses and viral co-detection with risks of complex febrile seizures (CFS) and hospitalization, adjusting for various covariates.
Key Findings:
  • Among 558 children, 95 (17.0%) had CFS.
  • Parainfluenza virus (PIV) was associated with lower odds of CFS (adjusted OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.89).
  • Seasonal coronaviruses were associated with lower odds of CFS (adjusted OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.89).
  • PIV was associated with lower odds of hospitalization (adjusted OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.80).
  • Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) was associated with lower odds of hospitalization (adjusted OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.78).
  • Viral co-detection occurred in 47.8%, and each additional virus was associated with lower odds of CFS (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.88) and hospitalization (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.90).
Interpretation:

Detection of certain respiratory viruses and viral co-detection was associated with lower odds of CFS and hospitalization, indicating the need for cautious interpretation of multiplex RT-PCR results.

Limitations:
  • Residual confounding and selection bias related to the retrospective design.
  • Clinician-directed testing may have influenced results.
Conclusion:

The study emphasizes the importance of cautious interpretation of multiplex RT-PCR results in relation to clinical presentation.

Original Source(s)

Related Content