Comment on “Long-term incontinence rates after traditional lateral internal sphincterotomy: a 5-year retrospective analysis from a high-volume tertiary referral center for proctologic disorders” - Summary - MDSpire

Comment on “Long-term incontinence rates after traditional lateral internal sphincterotomy: a 5-year retrospective analysis from a high-volume tertiary referral center for proctologic disorders”

  • By

  • R. Liu

  • J. Li

  • R. Geng

  • H. Xu

  • S. Zhong

  • November 15, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) for chronic anal fissure and address concerns regarding postoperative incontinence.

Key Findings:
  • LIS remains the gold standard for chronic anal fissure treatment.
  • Strict candidate selection enhances the reliability of continence outcomes.
  • Postoperative incontinence may overlap with natural age-related decline in anorectal function.
  • Time-segmented reporting could provide clearer insights into the transient nature of incontinence.
  • Patient satisfaction remains favorable despite documented incontinence rates.
Interpretation:

The study supports the long-term safety of LIS when performed with strict indications, but highlights the need for improved definitions and reporting methods to better inform patient outcomes.

Limitations:
  • Lack of consensus on incontinence definitions may skew results.
  • Absence of time-stratified outcome reporting could exaggerate long-term risk perception.
  • Limited incorporation of patient-reported outcomes may overlook the psychosocial impact.
Conclusion:

Future research should focus on standardized definitions, time-specific reporting, and patient-reported outcomes to refine risk estimates and enhance patient counseling.

Original Source(s)

Related Content