Case Report: Sequential leadless pacing after battery depletion in a patient with recurrent device-related infection - Summary - MDSpire

Case Study: Implementation of Sequential Leadless Pacing Following Battery Exhaustion in a Patient with Persistent Device-Associated Infections

  • By

  • Assel Chinybayeva

  • Gaziza Marat

  • Zhanasyl Suleymen

  • Ayan Abdrakhmanov

  • July 21, 2026

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a sequential leadless-only pacing strategy in a patient with a multi-decade history of pacing-related complications and recurrent device-associated infections.

Approach:
  • Patient Background: A 65-year-old patient with a 26-year history of cardiac pacing and recurrent device-related infections transitioned from a depleted first-generation leadless pacemaker to an AV-synchronous leadless pacemaker using a leave-in-situ approach.
Key Findings:
  • Sequential implantation was successfully performed with satisfactory acute electrical parameters (pacing threshold 0.63 V, R-wave amplitude 9.8 mV, impedance 720 Ω).
  • No evidence of inappropriate sensing or device-related complications was observed during follow-up.
  • Electrical parameters remained stable at follow-up, with atrioventricular synchrony of 80% at 1 month and 84-85% at 3-6 months.
Interpretation:

A sequential leadless-only pacing strategy may represent a feasible and safe long-term option in selected high-risk patients with device-related infections.

Limitations:
  • Limited clinical data on long-term management and sequential implantation strategies after battery depletion, particularly in the context of device-related infections.
  • The study is based on a single patient case, limiting generalizability.
Conclusion:

The sequential leadless-only pacing strategy may be a potential option for patients with a history of device-related infections.

Original Source(s)

Related Content