Oncological outcomes of planned and unplanned low Hartmann’s procedure and restorative low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study - Summary - MDSpire

Oncological outcomes of planned and unplanned low Hartmann’s procedure and restorative low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study

  • By

  • E. G. M. van Geffen

  • F. S. Verheij

  • S. M. J. A. Hazen

  • T. C. Sluckin

  • E. C. J. Consten

  • J.-W. T. Dekker

  • J. Nederend

  • K. C. M. J. Peeters

  • J. H. W. de Wilt

  • S. van Dieren

  • R. Hompes

  • J. B. Tuynman

  • C. A. M. Marijnen

  • P. J. Tanis

  • M. Kusters

  • November 23, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To compare oncological outcomes of patients who underwent low Hartmann’s procedure (low-HP) with restorative low anterior resection (rLAR) and identify factors contributing to differences in these outcomes, emphasizing their clinical significance.

Key Findings:
  • Low-HP associated with worse oncological outcomes, including 32% circumferential margin positivity and 15% 3-year local recurrence rate. Specific statistics for distant metastases, disease-free survival, and overall survival should be included.
  • Patients undergoing unplanned low-HP had more comorbidities, higher age, and more neoadjuvant irradiation compared to those with planned low-HP.
  • Interhospital variability in the proportion of low-HPs performed was significant, ranging from 0 to 42%.
Interpretation:

The study suggests that technical difficulties during surgery may lead to inferior oncological outcomes in patients undergoing low-HP compared to rLAR, highlighting the importance of surgical planning and execution for better patient outcomes.

Limitations:
  • Data on surgeon experience was not available, which may affect outcome interpretation.
  • The study is retrospective and may be subject to selection bias, potentially impacting the findings.
Conclusion:

Low-HP is associated with poorer oncological outcomes compared to rLAR, emphasizing the need for careful preoperative planning and consideration of patient factors that may influence surgical decisions, which is crucial for improving patient care.

Original Source(s)

Related Content