Tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single center, single-arm phase 2 trial - Summary - MDSpire

Tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single center, single-arm phase 2 trial

  • By

  • Mengyao Liu

  • Zengjun Liu

  • Jing Xu

  • Xin Xu

  • Qibing Wu

  • Dongyuan Zhu

  • June 8, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To explore the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combined with tislelizumab as initial treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are intolerant to platinum-based drugs.

Key Findings:
  • 30 patients were enrolled by the data cutoff date (September 1, 2025).
  • Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 13.9 months (95% CI: 11.4–16.3).
  • Median overall survival (mOS) was 23.3 months (IQR: 14.4–33.1; 95% CI: 18.2–28.3).
  • Confirmed ORR was 46.7% (14/30; 95% CI: 28.3–65.7) and DCR was 76.7%.
  • Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included leukopenia (43.3%) and neutropenia (40.0%).
  • Response rates differed by tumor-associated TLS status, with 66.7% in TLS positive and 35.3% in negative, but not statistically significant (P = 0.218).
Interpretation:

The combination of tislelizumab and gemcitabine showed manageable tolerability and promising preliminary efficacy as a first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who cannot receive cisplatin.

Limitations:
  • Single-center study may limit generalizability and applicability to broader populations.
  • Small sample size may affect the robustness of findings and statistical power.
  • Lack of statistical significance in TLS analysis suggests further investigation is needed.
Conclusion:

The findings warrant further investigation into the combination of tislelizumab and gemcitabine for this patient population, emphasizing the need for larger studies to validate these results.

Original Source(s)

Related Content