The Changing Landscape of Maintenance Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of the European Myeloma Network (EMN) - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Evolving Approaches to Maintenance Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis from the European Myeloma Network (EMN)

  • By

  • Heinz Ludwig

  • Evangelos Terpos

  • Francesca Gay

  • Niels W. C. J. van de Donk

  • Sarah Bernhard

  • Monika Engelhardt

  • Gordon Cook

  • Fredrik Schjesvold

  • Hermann Einsele

  • Graham Jackson

  • Charlotte Pawlyn

  • María-Victoria Mateos

  • Sonja Zweegman

  • Martin Schreder

  • Meral Beksaç

  • Christoph Driessen

  • Enrique M. Ocio

  • Rakesh Popat

  • Leo Rasche

  • Cyrille Touzeau

  • Pellegrino Musto

  • Annemiek Broijl

  • Meletios Dimopoulos

  • Roman Hajek

  • Mario Boccadoro

  • Pieter Sonneveld

  • June 18, 2026

Share

Objective:

To review current evidence on maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis for treatment comparison.

Approach:
  • Literature Review: Literature for this analysis was retrieved by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to November 2025. Articles were excluded if irrelevant to the research question, lacking a control group, using outdated treatment regimens, or missing PFS data.
Key Findings:
  • Lenalidomide maintenance post-ASCT is established as standard care, improving PFS and OS.
  • Continuous treatment in transplant-ineligible patients shows significant benefits in PFS and OS.
  • Emerging immune and cellular therapies are being investigated for maintenance therapy.
Interpretation:

The study analyzes maintenance therapy options for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, highlighting established and novel treatments.

Limitations:
  • Exclusion of studies lacking control groups or relevant data.
  • Potential biases in selected studies assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
Conclusion:

The findings highlight the need for robust comparisons of maintenance therapies.

Original Source(s)

Related Content