Are Researchers Learning to Trust AI?
Elsevier’s Mirit Eldor explores the gap between AI adoption and AI confidence, drawing on findings from the Researcher of the Future report
Objective: To understand how researchers are adapting to AI in their work and the factors influencing their trust in AI-generated insights.
Approach: Survey Insights: The report surveyed over 3,200 academic and corporate researchers globally regarding AI adoption and trust.AI Usage: 58% of researchers now use AI for tasks like literature reviews and data synthesis.Trust and Training: Only 22% find AI trustworthy; nearly half feel undertrained in its use.AI in Drug Development: AI is significantly impacting data synthesis, target identification, and lead optimization in drug discovery.Key Findings: 58% of researchers use AI, up from 37% in early 2023. 61% believe AI will drive new knowledge in the next 2-3 years. AI helps in consolidating vast data for drug discovery, saving time. Researchers express concerns about the 'black box' problem in AI. Interpretation: To build confidence in AI, researchers desire tools that cite sources, are trained on current literature, and demonstrate factual accuracy.
Limitations: Trust in AI remains low, with only 22% considering it trustworthy. Many researchers feel they lack adequate training to use AI effectively. Conclusion: For AI to be effectively integrated into research, it must be transparent, evidence-based, and reliable.
Sources: