Integrating Mendelian randomization, machine learning and retrospective clinical data: an exploratory analysis of the cross-disease association between CHB and PD, with a focus on eosinophil alterations - Summary - MDSpire

Integrating Mendelian randomization, machine learning and retrospective clinical data: an exploratory analysis of the cross-disease association between CHB and PD, with a focus on eosinophil alterations

  • By

  • Yao Ge

  • Hongbin Cai

  • Yike Li

  • YaTing Li

  • HuiFang Liu

  • Guilin Zeng

  • Kui Yang

  • Yang Luo

  • July 9, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To explore the potential associations and related molecular signatures between chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and Parkinson's disease (PD) using an integrated approach.

Approach:
  • Mendelian Randomization: Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was employed to assess the genetic correlation between CHB and PD.
  • Multi-Omics Analysis: Integration of transcriptomic data, metabolomic profiles, and GWAS data to identify cross-disease genes and pathways.
  • Machine Learning: Machine learning-driven gene screening was utilized to prioritize genes linked to both conditions.
  • Immune Infiltration Profiling: Analysis of immune cell profiles, particularly eosinophils, in relation to CHB and PD.
  • Retrospective Clinical Validation: Clinical validation was conducted in two independent cohorts to support findings.
Key Findings:
  • MR analysis indicated a genetically predicted inverse association between susceptibility to CHB and PD risk (OR = 0.82–0.94, p < 0.05).
  • RTN3 and MAP4K3 were identified as priority cross-disease genes linking CHB and PD.
  • Phenylalanine metabolism was highlighted as a dysregulated pathway, with elevated levels in CHB and lower levels in PD.
  • Eosinophil levels were found to decline in CHB but rise in PD, suggesting a potential link to the inverse correlation between the two diseases.
Interpretation:

Limitations:
  • The study relies on retrospective data, which may introduce biases.
  • The findings may not be generalizable to all populations due to the specific cohorts used.
Conclusion:

Original Source(s)

Related Content