Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and risk for hematologic malignancies: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Hematologic Malignancy Risk With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: A Multicenter Propensity Score–Matched Study

  • By

  • Pratik Shah

  • Adit Singhal

  • Tsu Hsien Wang

  • Albert Ko

  • Yu-Cheng Chang

  • Anita Ng

  • Andrew Shih

  • Yuan Ping Hsia

  • Cho-Hung Chiang

  • Cho-Han Chiang

  • October 12, 2026

Share

Objective:

To assess the association between GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use and incidence of hematologic malignancies in adults with type 2 diabetes, compared with DPP-4 inhibitors or SGLT2 inhibitors.

Approach:
  • Design and data: Retrospective propensity score–matched cohort study using the TriNetX electronic health record network. Adults initiating a GLP-1RA between January 2015 and March 2021 were compared with users of DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors.
  • Analysis: After 1:1 matching, analyses included 68,949 pairs for the DPP-4 inhibitor comparison and 71,391 pairs for the SGLT2 inhibitor comparison. Time-to-event outcomes were assessed from 180 days after treatment initiation through 5 years.
Key Findings:
  • Compared with DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1RAs were not associated with statistically significant differences in any assessed hematologic malignancy.
  • Compared with SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1RAs were associated with lower incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68–0.99), myeloproliferative neoplasms (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.67–0.91), and Hodgkin lymphoma (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.30–0.91).
  • No significant differences were found for the other assessed malignancies in the SGLT2 inhibitor comparison or for exploratory non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes in either comparison.
Interpretation:

Associations between GLP-1RA use and hematologic malignancy incidence differed by active comparator: lower incidence of three outcomes was observed versus SGLT2 inhibitors, but not versus DPP-4 inhibitors.

Limitations:
  • The study was retrospective and based on electronic health records.
  • The provided article context ends before the authors’ full discussion of limitations.
Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content