To investigate the predictive value of traditional cognitive reserve proxies on rehabilitation response and differences in baseline cognitive performance structure between responders and non-responders.
Key Findings:
Cognitive leisure activities were the strongest predictor of responder status (OR = 4.84).
Exploratory factor analysis revealed two cognitive dimensions: Memory and Executive-Spatial.
Responders did not show significantly higher baseline cognitive scores compared to non-responders, indicating no clear advantage in initial cognitive performance.
Network analyses indicated a more integrated cognitive-motor architecture in responders, characterized by higher density and lower sparsity.
Interpretation:
Remove this section or rephrase to avoid unsupported conclusions.
Limitations:
The study is retrospective and may be subject to selection bias.
Findings may not be generalizable beyond the studied population.
Conclusion:
Remove this section or rephrase to avoid unsupported implications.
