Dynamic changes and associated factors of asymmetric prominent vessel sign in atherosclerotic anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke: a preliminary study - Summary - MDSpire

Dynamic changes and associated factors of asymmetric prominent vessel sign in atherosclerotic anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke: a preliminary study

  • By

  • Wenjun Li

  • Cuicui Liu

  • Jinyang Wang

  • Yanan Jia

  • Huiling Ren

  • Junyan Liu

  • Yuzhu Xu

  • July 1, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To investigate the dynamic changes, influencing factors, and prognostic significance of the asymmetric prominent vessel sign (APVS) in patients with atherosclerotic anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Approach:
  • Study Design: Retrospective study of patients with atherosclerotic anterior circulation AIS admitted within 48 hours after symptom onset.
  • Data Collection: Clinical and imaging data were collected, including vascular stenosis, SWI-DWI mismatch, NIHSS scores, infarct volume, and mRS scores.
  • Patient Grouping: Patients were categorized into significant APVS change group (≥2 points) and non-significant change group (0–1 point) based on SWI-ASPECTS scores.
  • Statistical Analysis: Univariate analyses were performed to explore factors associated with APVS changes and their relationship with clinical outcomes.
Key Findings:
  • Among 34 patients, 11 were in the significant APVS change group.
  • APVS extent remained unchanged in 38.2% of patients, decreased in 58.8% (including complete disappearance in 17.6%), and increased in 2.9%.
  • Patients in the significant change group had larger baseline infarct volumes (T = −2.191, p = 0.028) and post-treatment infarct volumes (T = −2.779, p = 0.005), a higher proportion of severe vascular stenosis (p = 0.009), and higher baseline SWI-ASPECTS scores (T = −3.117, p = 0.002).
  • No statistically significant differences were observed in early neurological deterioration or 90-day mRS scores between groups.
Interpretation:

APVS extent decreased or disappeared in most patients after treatment, with certain baseline factors influencing APVS evolution.

Limitations:
  • Small sample size of 34 patients.
  • Retrospective design may introduce bias.
  • Lack of long-term follow-up data.
Conclusion:

APVS changes are influenced by baseline infarct volumes, vascular stenosis, and SWI-ASPECTS scores.

Original Source(s)

Related Content