Treatment first, transport second: rethinking stroke management with mobile stroke units—A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Prioritizing Treatment Over Transport: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials on Mobile Stroke Units in Stroke Management

  • By

  • Aishah Ibrahim Albakr

  • Ziyad Masoud Alqahtani

  • Abdulmonem Mohammed AlSharidah

  • Adel Abdalla Zeidan

  • Ahmed Abdulrahman Al Ibrahim

  • Mohammed Abdulmonem Al Zaher

  • Khurshid Khan

  • September 3, 2026

Share

Objective:

To determine how implementing mobile stroke units (MSUs) affects functional, safety, and temporal outcomes during acute stroke care, and to examine the necessity of having a neurologist onboard for MSU implementation.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials.
  • Data Sources: Literature search conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library.
  • Inclusion Criteria: Studies involving patients with suspected acute stroke managed through MSUs versus EMS, reporting at least one predefined main outcome.
Key Findings:
  • MSU intervention reduced the pooled median time by 26.3 minutes compared to control (p < 0.001).
  • No significant difference in outcomes was found between onboard and remote neurologist configurations (p = 0.7241).
  • Safety endpoints for intracerebral hemorrhage and mortality showed no significant pooled odds ratios: ICH, 1.019 [95% CI (0.71,1.45), p = 0.918]; and mortality, 1.23 [95% CI (0.85, 1.77), p = 0.271].
Limitations:
  • Variation among trial designs and inconsistent definitions of important time intervals.
  • Previous studies often had small sample sizes and insufficient comprehensive outcome assessments.
Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content