Comparison of transbrachial and transfemoral venous access in varicocele embolization: impact on radiation dose and technical success - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Transbrachial Versus Transfemoral Venous Access for Varicocele Embolization: Effects on Radiation Exposure and Technical Success

  • By

  • Anna-Maria Odenthal

  • Alexander Marc Christian Böhner

  • Tatjana Dell

  • Carsten Meyer

  • Matthäus Reinert

  • Marilia Voigt

  • Julian Alexander Luetkens

  • Patrick Arthur Kupczyk

  • October 8, 2026

Share

Objective:

To examine transbrachial versus transfemoral venous access for varicocele embolization, with emphasis on radiation exposure and procedural efficiency; technical success was also assessed.

Approach:
  • Design and population: Retrospective single-institution review of varicocele embolizations performed from November 2007 through December 2024. Patients whose records lacked radiation-dose data were excluded.
  • Outcomes: Primary outcomes were technical success, dose-area product (DAP), and fluoroscopy duration. Secondary measures included patient and procedural characteristics, contrast volume, procedure duration, and complications.
  • Procedure: Access was established through the right median cubital or basilic vein (transbrachial) or the right common femoral vein (transfemoral). Interventionalists selected access and embolization methods at their discretion.
Interpretation:

The provided context describes the study rationale and methods but does not report comparative results.

Limitations:
  • The study was retrospective and conducted at a single institution.
  • Patients whose records lacked radiation-dose data were excluded.
  • Access route and embolization method were selected at the interventionalist’s discretion.

Original Source(s)

Related Content