Self-reported versus measured anthropometry yields clinically relevant body mass index underestimation - Summary - MDSpire

Self-reported versus measured anthropometry yields clinically relevant body mass index underestimation

  • By

  • Maria Letizia Spizzichini

  • Davide Masi

  • Krzysztof Glaser

  • Dario Tuccinardi

  • Daniele Gianfrilli

  • Lucio Gnessi

  • Mikiko Watanabe

  • January 7, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To quantify bias in self-reported height and weight in a specialist outpatient population, assess its impact on BMI-based obesity classification, and identify predictors of misreporting.

Key Findings:
  • Mean misreporting was +3.13 cm for height, -0.97 kg for weight, and -1.63 kg/m² for BMI.
  • 20.0% of participants experienced WHO BMI-category misclassification, primarily due to under-classification (19.4%).
  • Sensitivity for detecting obesity based on self-report was 0.72, and specificity was 1.00.
  • Age predicted height over-reporting; age and measured BMI predicted weight under-reporting and BMI underestimation.
Interpretation:

Self-reported anthropometric data systematically underestimate BMI, leading to significant misclassification of obesity, which can adversely affect treatment access and management.

Limitations:
  • The study was conducted in a single outpatient clinic, which may limit generalizability.
  • Self-reported data may still carry inherent biases despite the study design aimed at minimizing them.
  • Potential biases in self-reporting remain a concern despite the study's design.
Conclusion:

Objective measurement of height and weight should be prioritized in clinical settings to ensure accurate obesity classification and appropriate management.

Original Source(s)

Related Content