The Use of Waivers of Guardian Permission in the United States for Pediatric Digital Health Intervention Research Since 2020: Systematic Review - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Examining Guardian Permission Waivers for Pediatric Digital Health Research in the U.S. Since 2020: A Systematic Review

  • By

  • Colleen Stiles-Shields

  • Elyse Shenberger

  • Ann Bernica

  • Gabriella Bobadilla

  • Kandis Fletcher

  • Jasmine George

  • Sydney Gordon

  • Erika L Gustafson

  • Crystal S Hernandez

  • Taylor L Hilderbrand

  • Sarah N Kumi

  • Christine A Lee

  • Sarah I Lorduy

  • Meera Phanse

  • Lauren M Potthoff

  • Naomi Quezada

  • Dale L Smith

  • Holly J Hudson

  • Emily E Anderson

  • September 25, 2026

Share

Objective:

To systematically review the implications of guardian permission waivers for pediatric digital health research in the U.S. since 2020.

Approach:
  • Background: The review discusses the mental health crisis among U.S. youth, exacerbated by provider shortages and access issues, and the potential role of digital health interventions.
  • Research Participation: It examines how guardian permission requirements can limit research participation among adolescents, particularly those from marginalized groups.
  • Ethical Considerations: The review highlights ethical concerns regarding the necessity of guardian consent in sensitive research areas, such as sexuality and mental health.
Key Findings:
  • Guardian permission requirements can skew research findings by limiting participation from certain youth subgroups.
  • Nearly 40% of LGBTQIA+-identified youth may decline participation if guardian consent is required due to fears of being outed.
  • Some states allow minors to seek mental health treatment without guardian consent, but this does not consistently apply to research.
Interpretation:

Requiring guardian permission may create barriers for adolescents seeking to participate in research that could benefit their mental health, particularly for those in vulnerable populations.

Limitations:
  • The review may not encompass all states' laws regarding guardian consent and research.
  • Potential biases in the studies reviewed may affect the generalizability of findings.
Conclusion:

The necessity of guardian permission in pediatric research poses significant challenges, particularly for marginalized youth, and may hinder access to beneficial digital health interventions.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content