Comparative efficacy of therapeutic modalities for metastatic uveal melanoma: a systemic review and network meta-analysis - Summary - MDSpire

Comparative efficacy of therapeutic modalities for metastatic uveal melanoma: a systemic review and network meta-analysis

  • By

  • Qinyun Chen

  • Jie Zhou

  • Hongli Zhou

  • Hao Wang

  • Jianhua Li

  • May 20, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

Evaluate the efficacy of various treatments for metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM).

Key Findings:
  • Liver-directed therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) showed the best efficacy for OS and PFS, indicating a significant advancement in treatment options.
  • Tebentafusp had the second-best OS but the worst PFS among treatments, highlighting its limitations.
  • ICIs were inferior to tebentafusp for OS but superior for PFS, suggesting a nuanced understanding of treatment effectiveness.
  • Liver-directed therapy demonstrated more favorable outcomes compared to conventional systemic chemotherapy, reinforcing its importance in treatment strategies.
Interpretation:

Liver-directed therapy combined with ICIs is the most effective treatment for mUM, while tebentafusp offers a significant but limited benefit.

Limitations:
  • Emerging immunotherapies and novel targeted agents could not be included due to lack of comparative trials.
  • Geographical variations in treatment practices may affect generalizability, and potential biases in the studies reviewed should be considered.
Conclusion:

Liver-directed therapy combined with ICIs is superior for extending OS and PFS in mUM. Future studies should include emerging therapies to further enhance treatment options.

Original Source(s)

Related Content