Short-course versus long-course antibiotics in bone infections: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Comparing Short- and Long-Duration Antibiotic Therapy for Bone Infections: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • By

  • Yang Sun

  • Yu Sun

  • Zhaolun Feng

  • Bo Hakert

  • Jiantong Ma

  • Jillian Cornish

  • October 19, 2026

Share

Objective:

To compare short- and long-course antibiotic therapy for bacterial bone infections, assessing treatment failure and antibiotic-related adverse events.

Approach:
  • Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis restricted to randomized controlled trials; the protocol was registered in PROSPERO and the review followed PRISMA guidelines.
  • Search and eligibility: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception through February 2026. Eligible trials compared short- with long-course antibiotics for bacterial bone infections.
  • Outcomes and analysis: The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as recurrence, persistent infection, or an unplanned additional intervention. Antibiotic-related adverse events were also assessed. Random-effects Mantel–Haenszel analyses used intention-to-treat and per-proto…
  • Quality assessment: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane ROB1 tool.
Interpretation:

The supplied context describes the rationale and planned methods but does not provide study results or pooled estimates; comparative effects cannot be summarized from this material.

Limitations:
  • The provided article context ends during the methods section and contains no included-trial details, results, or certainty-of-evidence findings.

Original Source(s)

Related Content