CT radiomics with transfer learning features for detecting DECT−positive periarticular monosodium urate crystal deposition: a single−center retrospective study - Summary - MDSpire

CT radiomics with transfer learning features for detecting DECT−positive periarticular monosodium urate crystal deposition: a single−center retrospective study

  • By

  • Weitao Huang

  • Xingjian Xu

  • Yongjun Ye

  • Yuguo Wei

  • Wenqiang Zheng

  • Xiaowei Han

  • Guozheng Zhang

  • July 1, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To develop and validate single−energy CT (135 kVp)−based radiomics and deep learning models for the non−invasive detection of periarticular monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition.

Approach:
  • Feature Extraction: Hand-crafted radiomics features were extracted from lesion ROIs and selected using t-test, Pearson correlation, LASSO, and mRMR. Deep features were derived from the maximum cross-sectional ROI using a ResNet50 transfer learning framework, and fused features underwent the same selection.
Key Findings:
  • Serum uric acid (OR 1.003), age (OR 1.017), bone erosion (OR 3.476), and CT value (OR 0.993) were independently associated with MSU deposition (all P < 0.05).
  • AUCs for the validation cohort were 0.820 (clinical), 0.912 (radiomics), 0.940 (DLR), and 0.942 (combined).
  • The combined model achieved accuracy 0.889, sensitivity 0.905, and specificity 0.837.
  • DLR and combined models significantly outperformed the clinical model (DeLong P < 0.05), with no significant difference between them.
Interpretation:

The single-energy CT-based radiomics and deep learning radiomics models showed comparable performance for identifying periarticular MSU deposition, with no statistically significant difference.

Limitations:
  • The reference standard was DECT-positive deposits, not the gold standard of MSU crystal detection in synovial fluid.
  • DECT's limited sensitivity for non−tophaceous lesions may affect results.
Conclusion:

The combined clinical−imaging model achieved numerically higher performance but did not significantly outperform the deep learning radiomics model.

Original Source(s)

Related Content