Comparison of Stability Between Panoptix and AT Lisa Trifocal Intraocular Lenses with Distinct Haptic Designs Utilizing the iTrace System - Summary - MDSpire
Advertisement
Comparison of Stability Between Panoptix and AT Lisa Trifocal Intraocular Lenses with Distinct Haptic Designs Utilizing the iTrace System
To compare the rotational stability of C-haptic PanOptix Toric and plate haptic AT Lisa Toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) using the iTrace system.
Key Findings:
The study utilized the iTrace system for objective measurement of IOL alignment.
Rotational stability differences between the two IOL designs were evaluated.
Hydrophobic acrylic (PanOptix) and hydrophilic acrylic (AT Lisa) materials were compared.
Interpretation:
The findings suggest that the haptic design and material of trifocal toric IOLs may influence their rotational stability, which is critical for optimal visual outcomes.
Limitations:
The study was retrospective and lacked formal randomization.
Sample size may limit the detection of smaller differences in rotational stability.
Conclusion:
Understanding the differences in rotational stability between IOL designs can guide selection for patients with significant corneal astigmatism seeking spectacle independence.
At the Outpatient Ophthalmic Surgery Society’s “OOSS Perspective 2026” symposium in Washington, DC, the organization's Washington counsel, Michael Romansky, JD, delivered an update on reimbursement, regulatory developments, and advocacy priorities affecting ophthalmic ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs).
More than 300 professionals gathered for three days of innovation, education, and collaboration, highlighting the latest advances in ophthalmic technology and clinical practice