The Hidden Source of Elevated Tau - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

The Hidden Source of Elevated Tau

  • October 30, 2026

  • 3 min

Share

Objective:

To assess whether selectively enriching brain-derived tau improves the ability of blood tests to distinguish Alzheimer’s disease from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Approach:
  • Direct testing: Researchers measured serum brain-derived tau and p-tau217 with commercial single-molecule array immunoassays in 139 patients with ALS, 101 with Alzheimer’s disease, and 75 disease controls.
  • Tau enrichment: In a subgroup of 60 patients with Alzheimer’s disease, 50 with ALS, and 39 disease controls, antibody-coated magnetic beads were used to enrich brain-derived tau before measurement.
  • Biological assessment: Targeted mass spectrometry examined tau isoforms in frontal cortex, spinal cord, and skeletal muscle samples.
Key Findings:
  • Direct testing found elevated serum brain-derived tau and p-tau217 in both Alzheimer’s disease and ALS compared with disease controls.
  • After enrichment, brain-derived tau and brain-derived p-tau217 were elevated in Alzheimer’s disease but not in ALS.
  • For distinguishing Alzheimer’s disease from ALS, the p-tau217 area under the ROC curve increased from 0.729 with direct testing to 0.900 after enrichment; the brain-derived tau-to-brain-derived p-tau217 ratio had an area under the curve of 0.961.
  • Mass spectrometry found brain-derived tau predominated in frontal cortex, big tau in skeletal muscle, and an intermediate profile in spinal cord. Muscle samples contained big p-tau217 but no detectable brain-derived p-tau217 after immunoprecipitation.
Interpretation:

The authors’ findings suggest that tau released from muscle can contribute to elevated blood tau measurements, including in ALS, and that selectively enriching brain-derived tau may improve diagnostic discrimination.

Limitations:
  • The enrichment analysis was conducted in a subgroup of the multicenter cohort.
  • The provided article context does not report confidence intervals, external validation, or performance in other muscle-damaging conditions.
Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content