Enhancing motor function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of bioelectrical feedback interventions - Summary - MDSpire

Enhancing motor function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of bioelectrical feedback interventions

  • By

  • Mengna Yao

  • Yi Qi

  • June 18, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of EMG-based bioelectrical feedback in the rehabilitation of stroke patients with hemiplegia compared to conventional rehabilitation.

Key Findings:
  • Bioelectrical feedback significantly improved total Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores (MD = 9.50, 95% CI (3.41, 15.60), p = 0.002).
  • Activities of Daily Living scores improved (MD = 8.80, 95% CI (3.67, 13.94), p = 0.0008).
  • Fugl-Meyer motor subscale scores improved (MD = 6.83, 95% CI (1.52, 12.14), p = 0.01).
  • Neurophysiological outcomes showed greater EMG amplitude (MD = 0.03 mV, 95% CI (0.00, 0.06), p = 0.03) and larger active range of motion (MD = 4.74°, 95% CI (1.99, 7.50), p = 0.0007).
  • Complications were significantly reduced (OR = 0.26, 95% CI (0.14, 0.49), p < 0.0001).
Interpretation:

While EMG-based bioelectrical feedback may improve motor function and reduce complications in hemiplegic stroke patients, high heterogeneity and limited studies necessitate cautious interpretation, particularly regarding the generalizability of findings.

Limitations:
  • High heterogeneity for most continuous outcomes (I2 = 69–98%).
  • Few pooled studies per outcome (3–6) limited subgroup analyses.
  • Geographic concentration of studies.
  • Inability to assess publication bias.
  • Small sample size of included studies may impact the robustness of findings.
Conclusion:

Adequately powered randomized controlled trials with blinded outcome assessment are needed before firm clinical recommendations can be made, particularly considering the need for diverse geographic representation.

Original Source(s)

Related Content