A Comparative Analysis of Eradication Success, Side Effects, and Adherence in Pediatric Patients Treated with Triple Therapy Versus Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection - Summary - MDSpire

A Comparative Analysis of Eradication Success, Side Effects, and Adherence in Pediatric Patients Treated with Triple Therapy Versus Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection

  • By

  • Yonghao Qian

  • Xiaozhen Hua

  • April 22, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To compare the eradication efficacy, symptom improvement, and safety between standard triple therapy and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in children aged X to Y years.

Key Findings:
  • Eradication rate was significantly higher in the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy group (90.36%) compared to the triple therapy group (74.36%) (P = 0.007), analyzed using [specific statistical method].
  • Post-treatment symptom scores improved more with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for abdominal pain, bloating, and nausea.
  • Incidence of adverse events and medication compliance rate were comparable between both groups.
Interpretation:

Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy shows superior efficacy in eradicating H. pylori and alleviating symptoms in pediatric patients compared to standard triple therapy, with similar safety profiles, suggesting it may be a preferred treatment option.

Limitations:
  • Retrospective design may introduce bias.
  • Limited generalizability due to single-center study.
  • Potential confounding factors not controlled for in the analysis.
Conclusion:

Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy is potentially advantageous for treating H. pylori in children, offering higher eradication rates and symptom relief without increased adverse effects.

Original Source(s)

Related Content