Comparative effectiveness of various exercise modalities on arterial stiffness and endothelial function in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - Summary - MDSpire

Comparative effectiveness of various exercise modalities on arterial stiffness and endothelial function in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

  • By

  • Hao Wen

  • YaoSen Liu

  • Wenrui Huang

  • Zhihu Ma

  • Haibo Zhao

  • July 13, 2026

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the comparative modulatory efficacy of various exercise modalities on endothelial function and arterial stiffness in older adults.

Approach:
  • Search Methodology: Systematically searched eight electronic databases for RCTs evaluating seven exercise modalities in older adults aged 60 years or older.
  • Eligibility Criteria: Included supervised, standardized training programs with a minimum duration of 4 weeks and continuous monitoring of exercise intensity.
  • Analysis Method: Performed a frequentist network meta-analysis to integrate direct and indirect trial evidence.
  • Evidence Assessment: Quality of evidence assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0 and CINeMA frameworks.
Key Findings:
  • Whole-body vibration and resistance training ranked highest for enhancing endothelial function.
  • Aerobic training and walking were associated with greater improvements in attenuating arterial stiffness.
  • Stretching exercise showed a higher probability of reducing systolic blood pressure.
  • Combined training ranked among the leading modalities for lowering diastolic blood pressure.
  • Reductions in systolic blood pressure exceeding 10 mmHg are clinically relevant.
Interpretation:

Exercise-induced vascular adaptations in older adults are likely modality-specific, with different modalities offering distinct benefits for endothelial function and arterial stiffness.

Limitations:
  • Extensive confidence interval overlap precluded definitive claims of clinical superiority.
  • Head-to-head differences generally lacked statistical significance.
  • Study heterogeneity and reliance on indirect network comparisons may affect results.
Conclusion:

Exercise monitoring tailored to specific phenotypic characteristics may refine clinical prescriptions, though caution is warranted due to potential risks of bias.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content