In-Stent Stenosis or Occlusion After Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients Treated With Anticoagulants vs Antiplatelet Therapy - Summary - MDSpire

In-Stent Stenosis or Occlusion After Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients Treated With Anticoagulants vs Antiplatelet Therapy

  • By

  • Mert Kök

  • Reinoud P. H. Bokkers

  • Aryan Mazuri

  • Saloua Akoudad

  • Maarten Uyttenboogaart

  • Clark J. Zeebregts

  • June 28, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To compare the incidence of in-stent stenosis or occlusion and the associated thromboembolic and bleeding risks in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) treated with anticoagulants versus those treated with antiplatelet therapy.

Approach:
  • Patient Selection: Eligible patients were identified based on specific criteria, excluding those with combined procedures, technical failures, or certain other conditions.
Key Findings:
  • The incidence of in-stent stenosis or occlusion varies widely in the literature, with reported rates of severe restenosis at 10.0% and ≥50% stenosis progression at 20.2%.
  • DAPT has been shown to reduce the 30-day risk of ipsilateral thromboembolic events compared to single antiplatelet therapy without significantly increasing bleeding risk.
  • Limited data exist on the use of DOACs in patients undergoing CAS, raising concerns about balancing thromboembolic and bleeding risks.
Interpretation:

The study aims to provide insights into the comparative outcomes of antithrombotic strategies in patients undergoing CAS, particularly in the context of increasing DOAC use.

Limitations:
  • The study is retrospective and conducted at a single center, which may limit generalizability.
  • Data on long-term outcomes and the efficacy of DOACs in this specific population are limited.
Conclusion:

Further research is needed to clarify the optimal antithrombotic strategies following CAS.

Original Source(s)

Related Content