Neurophysiological effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation combined with multidisciplinary rehabilitation in Parkinson’s disease - Summary - MDSpire

Neurophysiological effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation combined with multidisciplinary rehabilitation in Parkinson’s disease

  • By

  • Tingting Hou

  • Keke Chen

  • Hongyu Zhang

  • Tian Zhang

  • Xuping Yin

  • Rui Huang

  • Haodong Sun

  • Zhaohui Jin

  • Boyan Fang

  • July 6, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To identify neurophysiological and brain network features associated with motor improvement following high-intensity transcranial alternating current stimulation (Hi-tACS) combined with multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation therapy (MIRT) in Parkinson's disease patients.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (ChiCTR2300071969) involving 30 patients receiving Hi-tACS combined with MIRT.
  • Assessment Methods: Electroencephalographic spectral analysis, resting-state functional connectivity, and dynamic brain states assessed using hidden Markov modeling.
  • Statistical Analysis: Partial correlation analyses controlling for age and disease duration.
Key Findings:
  • Responders showed increased temporal high beta frequencies relative power (95%CI 0.85(0.01–1.66), P = 0.047).
  • Reduced connectivity between the default mode and sensorimotor networks (95%CI -0.89(-1.71–0.05), P = 0.038).
  • Decreased fractional occupancy of specific brain states (95%CI 0.03(0.00–0.28), P = 0.033 and 95%CI 0.02(0.00–0.35), P = 0.038).
  • Changes in temporal high beta frequencies relative power were negatively correlated with changes in total UPDRS part III scores (R = -0.59, PBON = 0.012) and rigidity subscores (R = -0.74, PBON < 0.001).
Interpretation:

Motor improvement following combined Hi-tACS and MIRT in PD patients is associated with alterations in brain oscillations and network connectivity, particularly in high-beta frequencies.

Limitations:
  • The study's findings are based on a small sample size of 30 patients.
  • The lack of significant group-level differences between active and sham interventions indicates variability in clinical response.
Conclusion:

The findings contribute to understanding the neural mechanisms underlying rehabilitation and neuromodulation in PD.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content