In Vitro Performance of Valved Holding Chambers in Paediatric Asthma Controller Therapy - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Evaluation of Valved Holding Chambers for Pediatric Asthma Management in Laboratory Settings

  • By

  • Laura Ojanperä

  • Lauri Lehtimäki

  • Péter Csonka

  • June 2, 2026

Share

Objective:

To evaluate fine particle delivery, total delivered dose (DD), and throat deposition of fluticasone mono-inhaler, fluticasone/salmeterol combination inhaler, and ciclesonide with three small-volume valved holding chambers (VHCs) using a simulated 4-year-old breathing profile.

Approach:
  • Study Design: In vitro testing using a Next Generation Impactor (NGI) and a pediatric throat model to simulate breathing patterns of a 4-year-old child.
  • VHCs Evaluated: Three VHCs were tested: AeroChamber Plus Flow-Vu (AC), EasyChamber (EC), and OptiChamber Diamond (OD).
  • Medication Delivery: Three pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) were used to deliver fluticasone, fluticasone/salmeterol, and ciclesonide.
  • Data Collection: Samples were collected from NGI stage cups and throat model after drug delivery, followed by quantification using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
Key Findings:
  • Significant variability in drug delivery was observed among different VHCs under simulated pediatric breathing conditions.
  • The aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) is crucial for effective drug deposition in the respiratory tract.
Interpretation:

Limitations:
  • The pediatric throat model used represents children aged 6–14 years, lacking a validated model for younger children.
  • The study was conducted in a laboratory setting, which may not fully replicate real-world conditions.
Conclusion:

Different VHCs can significantly impact the delivery of asthma medications in young children, necessitating careful selection for effective treatment.

Original Source(s)

Related Content