The impact of metabolic syndrome on survival outcomes in urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study - Summary - MDSpire

The impact of metabolic syndrome on survival outcomes in urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

  • By

  • Aspasia Manta

  • Afroditi Roumpou

  • Maria Gerogianni

  • Roubini Zakopoulou

  • Kimon Tzannis

  • Areti Mamali

  • Vasiliki Malamatini

  • Konstantina Kakogianni

  • Aristotelis Bamias

  • Melpomeni Peppa

  • June 30, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To explore the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and survival outcomes in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC).

Approach:
  • Study Design: A single-center retrospective study analyzing 112 UC patients diagnosed between January 2018 and February 2024.
  • Patient Categorization: Patients were categorized based on the presence of MetS (≥ 3 criteria) or its individual components.
  • Survival Analysis: Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard regression models.
Key Findings:
  • MetS was present in 43.8% of the cohort.
  • MetS was associated with poorer OS (HR 2.04, p=0.018) and PFS (HR 2.13, p=0.024) after adjustment for stage.
  • MetS independently predicted OS (HR 2.27, p=0.038).
  • Diabetes was the strongest individual predictor of adverse outcomes (adjusted HR for OS 3.33, p=0.001; PFS 3.35, p=0.002).
  • Hypertension independently predicted worse OS (HR 1.96, p=0.039).
  • Obesity and dyslipidemia were not associated with survival.
Interpretation:

MetS and its components, particularly diabetes and hypertension, were associated with poorer survival outcomes in patients with UC.

Limitations:
  • Single-center study may limit generalizability.
  • Retrospective design may introduce biases.
  • Incomplete data on waist circumference for obesity assessment.
Conclusion:

Further prospective studies are required to determine whether optimization of metabolic health can improve oncological outcomes.

Original Source(s)

Related Content