No-Flow Duration and Outcomes After Cardiogenic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Older Adults - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Impact of No-Flow Duration on Outcomes in Older Adults Experiencing Cardiogenic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

  • By

  • Yuki Kishihara

  • Masahiro Kashiura

  • Hideto Yasuda

  • Shunsuke Amagasa

  • Hiroyuki Tamura

  • Chisato Nakajima

  • Yuki Shiraoka

  • Masashi Okubo

  • Takashi Moriya

  • September 1, 2026

Share

Objective:

To characterize the relationship between no-flow duration and prognosis in older adults experiencing cardiogenic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Approach:
  • Study Design: Retrospective cohort study using a population-based, nationwide observational design from the All-Japan Utstein Registry.
  • Data Collection: Analyzed registry data collected between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2023, focusing on older adults aged 65 years or older with witnessed cardiogenic OHCA.
  • Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria: Included patients aged 65+, witnessed cardiogenic OHCA, and received resuscitation by paramedics; excluded cases with non-cardiogenic rhythms, witnessed by EMS, implausible no-flow intervals, or no-flow intervals exceeding 30 minutes.
  • Outcome Measures: Evaluated survival, 30-day Cerebral Performance Category score, and prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
Key Findings:
  • No-flow time is inversely associated with favorable outcomes in older adults experiencing cardiogenic OHCA based on the study's analysis.
  • Favorable neurologic outcomes are uncommon as no-flow time approaches 15 to 20 minutes, according to previous research.
  • Older adults may have shorter no-flow duration thresholds for favorable outcomes compared to the general adult population, as suggested by the study's findings.
Interpretation:

Identifying a no-flow duration threshold could assist clinical decision-making during resuscitation attempts in older adults, as indicated by the study.

Limitations:
  • The study is limited to cardiogenic OHCA, which may not generalize to other types of cardiac arrest.
  • Potential variability in CPR quality provided by bystanders was not fully accounted for.
Conclusion:

The study aims to provide insights into the impact of no-flow duration on outcomes for older adults with cardiogenic OHCA.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content