Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a meta-analysis - Summary - MDSpire

Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a meta-analysis

  • By

  • Cuifang Zeng

  • Lin Xie

  • Jie Zhang

  • Gang Tang

  • Rongxing Zhou

  • July 14, 2026

Share

Objective:

To compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in elderly patients.

Approach:
  • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searching multiple databases for studies comparing RPD and OPD in elderly patients.
Key Findings:
  • RPD group had lower overall morbidity (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22–0.92).
  • Fewer major complications in RPD group (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49–0.94).
  • Less intraoperative blood loss in RPD group (MD, -119.25 mL; 95% CI, -141.36 to -97.14).
  • Lower blood transfusion rates in RPD group (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34–0.72).
  • Shorter hospital stay for RPD group (MD, -1.63 days; 95% CI, -2.88 to -0.38).
  • No significant differences in mortality, operative time, postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, or reoperation rates.
Interpretation:

Limitations:
  • The study included only 6 studies with a total of 2,965 patients.
  • Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate findings.
Conclusion:

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content