Two ‘forever chemicals’ associated with higher risk of aggressive breast cancer in NIH analysis - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

NIH Analysis Links Two “Forever Chemicals” to Increased Risk of Aggressive Breast Cancer

  • By

  • Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (ASPA)

  • November 5, 2026

Share

Objective:

To examine whether blood concentrations of PFAS are associated with breast cancer incidence, including ER-negative breast cancer.

Approach:
  • Study population: Researchers analyzed 1,609 Sister Study participants who developed breast cancer and 2,269 comparison participants. The larger study enrolled U.S. and Puerto Rico women aged 35–74 who had a sister with breast cancer.
  • Exposure assessment: Researchers measured 17 PFAS in blood samples collected years before cancer diagnoses and compared breast cancer incidence across concentration groups.
  • Additional evidence: The reported associations were also examined through a meta-analysis of previous research.
Key Findings:
  • Higher blood concentrations of PFOA and PFOS were associated with increased incidence of ER-negative breast cancer.
  • Compared with women in the lowest concentration groups, those with the highest PFOA concentrations had a 67% higher rate of ER-negative breast cancer; the corresponding rate for PFOS was 93% higher.
  • Neither chemical showed a clear association with overall breast cancer risk.
  • The reported percentages are relative differences between groups, not individual probabilities of developing breast cancer.
Interpretation:

The authors proposed that PFAS might affect risk through non-hormonal mechanisms, such as changes in gene activity or immune function; these mechanisms were not examined in the study.

Limitations:
  • The study found associations and does not establish that PFOA or PFOS caused breast cancer.
  • The proposed biological mechanisms were not tested.
  • The analysis focused on women with a family history of breast cancer, and the article calls for further research in populations with greater PFAS exposure and those disproportionately affected by ER-negative breast cancer.
  • The study did not assess breast cancer risk associated with newer PFAS replacement chemicals.
Conclusion:

The authors state that further research is needed, particularly on newer PFAS replacements and populations with greater exposure.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content