Telehealth Utilization for Prostate Cancer Management in the Veteran Affairs Healthcare System: A Study from 2016 to 2023 - Summary - MDSpire

Telehealth Utilization for Prostate Cancer Management in the Veteran Affairs Healthcare System: A Study from 2016 to 2023

  • By

  • Amin Nakhostin-Ansari

  • Zain Khera

  • Daniel Becker

  • Navid Dardashti

  • Stacy Loeb

  • Danil Makarov

  • Andrew Nicholson

  • Stephanie L. Orstad

  • Jerry Thomas

  • Leah L. Zullig

  • Scott E. Sherman

  • July 7, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To describe rates of telehealth utilization across prostate cancer management groups before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and examine patient characteristics associated with telehealth utilization among Veterans diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Approach:
  • Data Source: Retrospective observational cohort study using electronic medical record data from the VHA’s Corporate Data Warehouse from 2016 to 2023.
  • Study Population: Identified Veterans with a new diagnosis of prostate cancer from January 1, 2016, to January 31, 2023, excluding those who died within a year of diagnosis or had incomplete data.
  • Defining Outpatient Encounters: Gathered outpatient visits related to urologic and oncologic care post-diagnosis, classifying them as phone visits and video visits.
  • Patient Characteristics: Assessed variables including age, race, marital status, rurality, smoking history, BMI, and disability percentage.
Key Findings:
  • Prostate cancer has the third highest incidence rate globally and is the most common non-skin cancer among males in the US.
  • Telehealth has shown potential to enhance access to care and reduce costs, yet its adoption has been slow until the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • The VHA provides a unique platform to study telehealth utilization among Veterans with prostate cancer due to its equal-access system.
Interpretation:

Limitations:
  • The study is limited to data from the VHA, which may not be generalizable to other healthcare systems.
  • Potential biases in self-reported data for race and ethnicity.
Conclusion:

Original Source(s)

Related Content