Cost-Effectiveness of Universal Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Lung Cancer Screening in Singapore - Summary - MDSpire

Cost-Effectiveness of Universal Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Lung Cancer Screening in Singapore

  • By

  • Ruijie Li

  • John Abisheganaden

  • July 8, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of four low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening strategies for lung cancer in Singapore, including never smokers.

Approach:
  • Model Development: A Markov cohort model was developed using demographic, epidemiologic, and clinical data from Singapore to assess LDCT screening strategies.
  • Economic Evaluation: The analysis followed CHEERS guidelines, focusing on direct medical costs over a lifetime horizon, with costs and outcomes discounted at 3% per year.
Key Findings:
  • Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Singapore, with 82% diagnosed at late stages and a 5-year relative survival of 22.1% for males and 38.0% for females.
  • Approximately 48% of lung cancer cases occur in never smokers, particularly among East Asian females with adenocarcinoma.
  • Only 38.1% of lung cancer patients meet the NLST screening criteria.
  • The TALENT trial achieved a 2.6% detection rate in never smokers, prompting national screening initiatives.
  • Most economic evaluations suggest LDCT screening is cost-effective, but no studies have used Singapore data for never smoker screening.
Interpretation:

The study emphasizes the necessity for tailored screening strategies in Singapore, particularly for never smokers, due to the unique demographic and epidemiological context.

Limitations:
  • The study did not include individual-level patient data, thus no institutional review board approval was required.
  • The model's parameters were based on aggregate data, which may limit the applicability of findings and the generalizability of the results.
Conclusion:

The evaluation of LDCT screening strategies in Singapore indicates potential benefits for including never smokers, though further research is needed.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content