Higher vs. lower positive end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Summary - MDSpire

Higher vs. lower positive end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • By

  • Xinrui Yin

  • Shijia Du

  • May 11, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the effects of higher vs. lower fixed PEEP strategies on intraoperative hypotension and postoperative pulmonary complications specifically in thoracic surgery patients.

Key Findings:
  • Higher PEEP significantly increased the risk of intraoperative hypotension (RR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.29–3.63, p = 0.003).
  • Higher PEEP did not significantly reduce the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.88–1.02, p = 0.179).
  • New-onset arrhythmia was more frequent with higher PEEP (RR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.76–3.71).
  • Rescue hypoxaemia interventions were less frequent with higher PEEP (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.25–0.56).
  • Intraoperative PaO2 was directionally higher with higher PEEP but statistically inconclusive due to heterogeneity.
Interpretation:

Higher fixed PEEP during OLV increases the risk of intraoperative hypotension without providing measurable benefits in reducing postoperative pulmonary complications.

Limitations:
  • Moderate certainty of evidence due to heterogeneity in studies.
  • Limited number of studies included in the analysis, which may affect the robustness of the findings.
Conclusion:

Routine application of higher fixed PEEP during OLV should be approached with caution; future research should actively explore individualized PEEP titration strategies.

Original Source(s)

Related Content