Community-informed trial design and implementation to optimize recruitment and retention in low-income settings: lessons from rheumatic heart disease trials in Uganda - Summary - MDSpire

Community-informed trial design and implementation to optimize recruitment and retention in low-income settings: lessons from rheumatic heart disease trials in Uganda

  • By

  • Juliet Alepere

  • Susan Akullo

  • Pamela Okwir Apio

  • Brenda Atim

  • Andrea Beaton

  • Anneke Grobler

  • Samalie Kitooleko

  • Haddy Nalubwama

  • Emma Ndagire

  • Emmy Okello

  • Isaac Otim Omara

  • Jafes Pulle

  • Joselyn Rwebembera

  • Craig Sable

  • Amy Scheel

  • Alison Spaziani

  • Andrew Steer

  • Rachel Sarnacki

  • July 13, 2026

Share

Objective:

To address challenges in conducting randomized clinical trials for rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in low-income areas by implementing a community-centered framework.

Approach:
  • Community Engagement: Utilized 'community engagement studios' and a Community Advisory Board for ongoing consultation and feedback throughout the trial.
  • Trial Design: Developed a flexible trial design that incorporates community input to enhance participant recruitment and retention.
  • GOAL-family Studies: Applied community-informed approaches in the GOAL-family of studies to improve care for children with early RHD.
Key Findings:
  • Achieved consent rates over 99% and retention rates over 97% at trial completion.
  • Demonstrated over 99% adherence to monthly injections in the GOAL trial.
  • Community-informed strategies effectively addressed barriers to trial participation in low-resource settings.
Interpretation:

The RRCU's community-informed approach challenges assumptions about research feasibility in low-resource settings and shows that ethical pediatric research can be conducted successfully by engaging communities.

Limitations:
  • The study's findings may not be generalizable to all low-income settings due to specific cultural and contextual factors in Uganda.
  • Limited infrastructure and resources in LMICs may still pose challenges despite community engagement efforts.
Conclusion:

The community-centered framework can serve as a model for enhancing recruitment and retention in clinical trials across various diseases in low-income areas.

Original Source(s)

Related Content