Cochlear implant artifact analysis in cranial MRI: effects of field strength and imaging sequence - Summary - MDSpire

Analysis of Cochlear Implant Artifacts in Cranial MRI: Impact of Magnetic Field Strength and Imaging Techniques

  • By

  • Siqi Gao

  • Kaiyue Zhao

  • Longtao Ma

  • Jun Lin

  • Dongmei Wang

  • Jiayu Ni

  • Dian Yang

  • Jiaying Wang

  • Zili Yin

  • Mengxue Zhang

  • Yiqi Ma

  • Hongjian He

  • Yuan Li

  • July 17, 2026

Share

Objective:

To investigate the artifacts produced by the cochlear implant (CI) CS-30A in nonimplanted human clinical trials under different magnetic resonance (MR) field strengths and imaging sequences.

Approach:
  • Participants: 12 healthy subjects underwent axial cranial MR scans at 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths using T1-weighted SE, T2-weighted FSE, and T2*-weighted GRE sequences.
  • Artifact Measurement: Maximum dimensions of CI artifacts were measured, and artifact areas were quantified using manual measurement and a deep learning-based automatic segmentation algorithm.
  • Evaluation: Radiologists evaluated the impact of CI artifacts on the visibility of brain anatomy.
Key Findings:
  • GRE sequences produced significantly larger artifact maximum dimensions and areas compared to SE and FSE sequences (p < 0.05).
  • No significant differences in maximum artifact dimensions were found between 1.5 T and 3.0 T MR across sequences (p > 0.05).
  • Artifact area measurements on SE sequences showed high consistency between manual and automatic segmentation methods (p = 0.377).
Interpretation:

GRE sequences should be avoided for CI recipients due to larger artifacts, while SE or FSE sequences are recommended.

Limitations:
  • The study was conducted on a small sample size of 12 healthy subjects.
  • Results may not be generalizable to all CI models or patients with varying conditions.
Conclusion:

SE or FSE sequences should be prioritized over GRE for CI recipients, and both 1.5 T and 3.0 T are clinically feasible.

Original Source(s)

Related Content