Surgical resection versus biopsy in the treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Summary - MDSpire

Surgical resection versus biopsy in the treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • By

  • Rafał Chojak

  • Marta Koźba-Gosztyła

  • Karolina Polańska

  • Marta Rojek

  • Aleksandra Chojko

  • Rafał Bogacz

  • Natalia Skorupa

  • Jakub Więcław

  • Bogdan Czapiga

  • November 30, 2022

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To compare overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with PCNSL who underwent surgical resection versus those who underwent biopsy alone.

Key Findings:
  • Surgical resection may improve overall survival and progression-free survival in selected PCNSL patients, but evidence is mixed.
  • The role of surgical resection remains controversial, with studies showing both potential benefits and lack of improvement in outcomes.
  • High-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for PCNSL.
Interpretation:

The findings suggest that surgical resection could be beneficial for some PCNSL patients, but further research is needed to establish clear guidelines on its role.

Limitations:
  • Heterogeneity among included studies may affect the reliability of results, potentially leading to conflicting conclusions.
  • Potential publication bias and exclusion of non-English studies could limit the generalizability of the findings.
Conclusion:

The decision between surgical resection and biopsy for PCNSL should be individualized, considering potential benefits and risks for each patient.

Original Source(s)

Related Content