Foundation model-enhanced multimodal radiomics for predicting response to chemo-immunotherapy in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma - Summary - MDSpire
Advertisement
Enhanced Multimodal Radiomics Utilizing Foundation Models for Anticipating Chemo-Immunotherapy Outcomes in Advanced Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma
To develop and validate a foundation model–driven multimodal fusion framework for non-invasive prediction of treatment response to first-line chemo-immunotherapy in patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC).
Approach:
Data Collection: Baseline contrast-enhanced CT images and clinical data were collected from patients with advanced LUSC receiving first-line chemo-immunotherapy.
Feature Extraction: Handcrafted radiomics features were extracted from tumor regions, and 2.5D deep learning features were extracted using a DINO-pretrained vision Transformer foundation model.
Model Construction: A multi-source features fusion model was constructed using machine learning classifiers, incorporating both radiomics and clinical variables.
Model Evaluation: Model performance was evaluated using AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, along with DeLong testing, DCA, NRI, and IDI for comparative assessment.
Interpretability Analysis: SHAP analysis was applied to enhance model interpretability and decision transparency.
Key Findings:
The multi-source features fusion model (FusionModel) achieved an AUC of 0.903 and an accuracy of 0.885 in the training cohort.
In the validation cohort, FusionModel achieved an AUC of 0.863 and an accuracy of 0.836.
FusionModel outperformed single-modality feature models and demonstrated superior net clinical benefit on DCA.
NRI and IDI analyses indicated improved reclassification ability.
SHAP analysis showed that deep learning features were the dominant contributors, with radiomics and clinical variables providing complementary information.
Interpretation:
The foundation model-driven multi-source features fusion model enabled accurate prediction of chemo-immunotherapy response in advanced LUSC.
Limitations:
The study is retrospective and may be subject to selection bias.
The generalizability of the findings may be limited to the specific patient cohort studied.
Conclusion:
The study presents a non-invasive tool for treatment stratification in advanced LUSC.