Impact of Thyroiditis on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology: A Clinico-Radiological and Cytological Evaluation of Discordance Risk Factors - Summary - MDSpire

Impact of Thyroiditis on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology: A Clinico-Radiological and Cytological Evaluation of Discordance Risk Factors

  • By

  • Matrix M. H. Fung

  • Anthony T. Y. Ng

  • Nicholas T. C. Ng

  • Joanna K. M. Ng

  • Joshua J. X. Li

  • Philippe Vielh

  • Philip P. C. Ip

  • February 25, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate how thyroiditis affects the risk of neoplasm and malignancy in thyroid aspirates and to assess the diagnostic concordance across Bethesda categories, particularly focusing on atypical results.

Key Findings:
  • Out of 770 thyroid aspirates, 132 were from patients with thyroiditis, primarily lymphocytic thyroiditis, indicating a significant subset of cases.
  • The risk of neoplasm (RON) and risk of malignancy (ROM) varied across Bethesda categories, with notable differences in the C1 category, suggesting a need for careful interpretation.
  • The thyroiditis group had a higher proportion of C3 aspirates compared to the non-thyroiditis group, which may complicate diagnosis.
  • Overall concordance rates were slightly lower in the thyroiditis group, particularly when C3 was treated as positive, highlighting the diagnostic challenges.
Interpretation:

Thyroiditis influences the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology, particularly affecting the interpretation of atypical results, which may lead to misdiagnosis.

Limitations:
  • Retrospective design may introduce selection bias, affecting the generalizability of the findings.
  • Limited generalizability due to single-center study, which may not reflect broader populations.
  • Potential confounding factors not fully controlled, such as variations in clinical management.
Conclusion:

Thyroiditis can complicate the diagnostic interpretation of thyroid aspirates, necessitating careful consideration in clinical decision-making, particularly in atypical cases.

Original Source(s)

Related Content