Long-term outcomes after resting full-cycle ratio and deferral of revascularization - Summary - MDSpire

Long-term outcomes after resting full-cycle ratio and deferral of revascularization

  • By

  • Stephan Nienaber

  • Jakob Wind

  • Philipp Lake

  • Victor Mauri

  • M. Adam

  • Karl Finke

  • Henning Guthoff

  • Stephan Baldus

  • Marcel Halbach

  • Hendrik Wienemann

  • July 7, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate clinical outcomes following resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) assessment and investigate the association between RFR values > 0.89 and cardiovascular events.

Approach:
  • Patient Population: Included 773 patients with angiographically intermediate coronary artery disease who underwent RFR assessment leading to deferred revascularization.
  • Resting Full-Cycle Ratio Measurement: RFR was defined as the lowest Pd/Pa recorded over at least five consecutive cardiac cycles, with a cutoff of 0.89 indicating myocardial ischemia.
  • Study Endpoints: Primary endpoint was the 2-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), with secondary endpoints including all-cause death and vessel-oriented composite outcomes (VOCO).
Key Findings:
  • RFR assessment was performed on 1012 lesions, with a focus on deferred revascularization.
Interpretation:

The study provides insights into the long-term outcomes of patients with deferred revascularization based on RFR values.

Limitations:
  • Real-world data validating RFR measurements remain limited and primarily derived from small patient cohorts.
  • No FFR measurements were included in this cohort for comparison.
Conclusion:

The findings contribute to understanding the clinical utility of RFR in managing coronary artery disease.

Original Source(s)

Related Content