Real-world multicenter assessment of sustained clinical outcomes after digital deep brain stimulation - Summary - MDSpire

Real-world multicenter assessment of sustained clinical outcomes after digital deep brain stimulation

  • By

  • Alireza Gharabaghi

  • Sergiu Groppa

  • Elena Casas

  • Alfons Schnitzler

  • Laura Muñoz-Delgado

  • Vicky L. Marshall

  • Jessica Karl

  • Lin Zhang

  • Ramiro Alvarez

  • Mary S. Feldman

  • Michael J. Soileau

  • Lan Luo

  • Benjamin L. Walter

  • Chengyuan Wu

  • Hong Lei

  • Damian M. Herz

  • Devyani Nanduri

  • Claudia A. Salazar

  • Corneliu Luca

  • Daniel Weiss

  • January 14, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the long-term clinical effectiveness and safety of remote digital deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming compared to in-clinic follow-up in patients with Parkinson's disease, emphasizing the comparative aspect.

Key Findings:
  • Sustained clinical benefits and similar improvements in outcomes, quality of life, and safety across both remote and in-clinic groups at 6 and 12 months, with specific statistical significance noted.
  • Patient- and clinician-reported global improvement scores remained favorable over time with no significant between-group differences.
  • Quality of life improved in both groups, with significant longitudinal improvements in PDQ-39 Summary Index scores.
  • Motor function improved similarly in both groups, with no significant differences in MDS-UPDRS Part III scores.
Interpretation:

The findings support the ecological validity and scalability of remote DBS programming, demonstrating that it can achieve long-term outcomes comparable to traditional in-clinic care, with implications for broader clinical practice.

Limitations:
  • The observational phase did not preserve strict group separation, which may affect the interpretation of outcomes and introduce potential biases.
  • The study was not designed to demonstrate replacement of in-clinic care by remote programming.
Conclusion:

Remote DBS programming is a viable complementary option to in-clinic care, showing sustained benefits for patients with Parkinson's disease over the long term, highlighting the importance of patient choice in care models.

Original Source(s)

Related Content