Computed tomography findings and surgical outcomes in acute mesenteric ischemia: a retrospective single-center cohort study - Summary - MDSpire

Computed tomography findings and surgical outcomes in acute mesenteric ischemia: a retrospective single-center cohort study

  • By

  • Andrea Cavallaro

  • Antonio Zanghì

  • Alessandro Cappellani

  • Francesco Leonforte

  • Antonio Mistretta

  • Mariacristina Micalizzi

  • Paolo Di Mattia

  • Massimiliano Veroux

  • Kenya Tiralongo

  • June 24, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate predefined CT findings, AMI subtype, treatment pathways, intraoperative infarction or necrosis, and mortality in patients with CT-confirmed acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI).

Approach:
  • Study Design: A retrospective single-center cohort study including 102 adult patients with CT-confirmed AMI.
  • Classification: Patients were classified by AMI subtype: arterial occlusive AMI, venous AMI, non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI), or secondary/mechanical ischemia.
  • CT Findings Analysis: Eight predefined CT findings were analyzed, and their associations with intraoperative infarction or necrosis were evaluated.
  • Endpoints: Primary endpoint was intraoperative evidence of bowel infarction or necrosis; secondary endpoints included in-hospital and 30-day mortality.
Key Findings:
  • Arterial occlusive AMI was the most common subtype (57.8%).
  • In-hospital mortality was 41.2%, and 30-day mortality was 46.5%.
  • Intraoperative infarction or necrosis was present in 81.5% of assessable patients.
  • No individual CT finding showed strong standalone discriminatory performance for intraoperative infarction or necrosis.
  • Pneumatosis intestinalis showed the strongest descriptive performance for the primary endpoint (OR: 2.72, 95% CI: 0.76–9.80; p = 0.188; AUC 0.62).
Interpretation:

CT findings were clinically meaningful but had limited standalone discriminatory performance for surgically confirmed infarction or necrosis. Pneumatosis showed an exploratory association with 30-day mortality.

Limitations:
  • The study was conducted at a single center, which may limit generalizability to broader populations.
Conclusion:

CT remains essential for diagnosis, subtype classification, and treatment planning in AMI, but findings should not be used as a validated triage or prognostic tool.

Original Source(s)

Related Content