Evaluation of Practical Monitoring Approaches for Patients Receiving Systemic Treatment for Brain Metastases - Summary - MDSpire

Evaluation of Practical Monitoring Approaches for Patients Receiving Systemic Treatment for Brain Metastases

  • By

  • Britney Weng

  • Caressa Hui

  • Jerica Lomax

  • Ahmed Mohyeldin

  • Nataliya Mar

  • Warren A. Chow

  • Misako Nagasaka

  • Jeremy Harris

  • Aaron B. Simon

  • April 20, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To assess surveillance strategies and outcomes specifically for patients treated with systemic therapy alone for active brain metastases.

Key Findings:
  • 14 out of 33 patients' treatments met the 2021 guidelines.
  • Median time to 1st, 2nd, and 3rd MRI was 45, 95, and 180 days, respectively.
  • One-year cumulative incidence of local progression was 0.43 (95% CI [0.18-0.66]) in the guideline group and 0.32 (95% CI [0.13-0.52]) in the non-guideline group (p=0.5).
  • One-year cumulative incidence of brain radiation was 0.29 (95% CI [0.09-0.53]) in the guideline group and 0.44 (95% CI [0.22-0.64]) in the non-guideline group (p=0.87).
  • Two patients experienced seizures as safety events during systemic therapy.
Interpretation:

CNS-penetrating systemic therapies are increasingly used, often exceeding guideline recommendations, indicating a need for improved surveillance imaging frequency and management of recurrences, as many patients delayed radiation for over a year with few safety events.

Limitations:
  • Retrospective design may limit the generalizability of findings.
  • Small sample size restricts statistical power and robustness of conclusions.
  • Lack of standardized surveillance protocols may affect consistency in monitoring.
Conclusion:

As interest in CNS-penetrating therapies grows, there is a critical need for evidence-based guidelines for patient surveillance in this evolving treatment landscape, necessitating further research.

Original Source(s)

Related Content