Comparing video-based and four-step simulation training in paediatric basic life support: a pilot randomised controlled study - Summary - MDSpire

Comparing video-based and four-step simulation training in paediatric basic life support: a pilot randomised controlled study

  • By

  • Farah Thabet

  • Habib Besbes

  • Houda Ajmi

  • Seyfeddine Zayani

  • Jalel Chemli

  • Slaheddine Chouchane

  • June 29, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To compare video-based instruction and four-step low-fidelity simulation for pediatric Basic Life Support (BLS) training among interns and nurses.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Pilot randomized controlled trial conducted in two teaching hospitals in Tunisia.
  • Participants: 60 participants (33 interns, 27 nurses) without formal pediatric BLS certification in the past 2 years.
  • Training Methods: Participants were randomized to receive either video-based instruction or simulation-based training covering identical ERC 2021 pediatric BLS content.
  • Assessment: Knowledge assessed via a 15-item questionnaire, practical skills evaluated through a SimBaby scenario, and learner satisfaction measured using a 5-point Likert scale.
Key Findings:
  • Both training modalities significantly improved knowledge and skills immediately after training (median knowledge scores: video 86.7%, simulation 86.7%, p=0.270; practical skills median 90.0%, p=0.18).
  • At 3 months, knowledge and skills retention declined significantly across both groups (median knowledge 61.5%, p<0.001; skills 80.0%, p=0.035).
  • Exploratory analyses suggested higher skill scores among nurses trained with simulation compared to video-based instruction (90.0% vs 85.0%, p=0.023).
  • All participants reported high satisfaction with no differences between groups.
Interpretation:

Both video-based instruction and low-fidelity simulation improved pediatric BLS knowledge and skills, with no significant differences overall.

Limitations:
  • Pilot study design with limited sample size.
  • Single-country setting.
  • Absence of long-term clinical outcome assessment.
Conclusion:

The study indicates the need for regular refresher training due to observed declines in knowledge and skills at 3 months. Larger multicentre studies are warranted.

Original Source(s)

Related Content