Active surveillance or surgical resection? A survey of treatment strategies for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in adults - Summary - MDSpire

Active surveillance or surgical resection? A survey of treatment strategies for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in adults

  • By

  • Xia Qin

  • Ming-tao Chang

  • Qiao-zhi Feng

  • Rui Feng

  • Jian-fa Chen

  • June 18, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To investigate the clinical status of active monitoring (active surveillance) or surgical resection for adult low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in military and local medical institutions in southern China.

Approach:
    Key Findings:
    • 36 medical institutions participated, with an average annual thyroid surgery volume exceeding 100 cases.
    • 16.7% of institutions recommended FNAC for all suspicious nodules, while 25.0% recommended it only for nodules larger than 10 mm.
    • Treatment decisions were left to patients in 36.1% of institutions.
    • 48.1% of patients underwent immediate surgery, 36.9% chose initial active surveillance, and 13.3% received ablation.
    • 28.0% of patients initially managed with active surveillance subsequently underwent surgery.
    Interpretation:

    There is significant variability in the management of low-risk PTMC across institutions, with a notable proportion adopting active surveillance, highlighting the need for standardized protocols.

    Limitations:
    • The study reflects practices in specific military and local medical institutions, which may not generalize to other regions, potentially affecting treatment consistency.
    • Variability in treatment protocols and patient preferences may affect the consistency of active surveillance implementation.
    Conclusion:

    More than one-third of low-risk PTMC patients adopted active surveillance, but educational efforts directed at clinicians and patients, along with refined guidelines, are needed for standardized application.

Original Source(s)

Related Content