Unveiling a J-shaped association between the triglyceride-glucose index and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study of 1,065 patients - Summary - MDSpire

Unveiling a J-shaped association between the triglyceride-glucose index and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study of 1,065 patients

  • By

  • Yikang Xu

  • Jia Liu

  • Yang Yang

  • Limin Liu

  • Jingru Ma

  • Xiren Meng

  • Shuochao Zhao

  • Yaxin Wang

  • Lisheng Xu

  • Stephen E. Greenwald

  • July 7, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To investigate the dose-response relationship between the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and to examine potential nonlinear associations.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Single-center retrospective cohort study involving 1,065 AMI patients who underwent coronary angiography.
  • Data Collection: Baseline data collected from electronic medical records; TyG index calculated using the formula: TyG = Ln [triglycerides (mg/dL) × fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL)]/2.
  • Outcome Measurement: Primary outcome was in-hospital MACE, defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, acute heart failure, malignant arrhythmia, recurrent myocardial infarction, and cardiogenic shock.
  • Statistical Analysis: Multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic splines used to analyze the association between TyG index groups and MACE.
Key Findings:
  • Overall incidence of in-hospital MACE was 21.13%.
  • The T2 group had a significantly higher MACE incidence (26.04%) compared to the T1 group (16.76%, p = 0.011).
  • In the core model, the T2 group had a 178% increased risk of in-hospital MACE compared to T1 (OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.38–5.59, p = 0.004).
  • A significant J-shaped relationship was found between the TyG index and MACE risk, with an inflection point at TyG = 9.05.
  • For TyG index <9.05, MACE risk did not change significantly (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.62–1.77, P = 0.875); for TyG index ≥9.05, MACE risk increased by 124% (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.26–3.96, P = 0.006).
Interpretation:

The study demonstrates a significant J-shaped nonlinear association between the TyG index and in-hospital MACE risk.

Limitations:
  • Single-center study may limit generalizability.
  • Retrospective design may introduce bias.
  • Potential confounding factors not fully accounted for.
Conclusion:

The findings highlight the importance of considering the nonlinear effect of the TyG index in risk assessment for AMI patients.

Original Source(s)

Related Content