Electrosurgical devices in gynecologic oncology: a systematic review of clinical studies - Summary - MDSpire

Electrosurgical devices in gynecologic oncology: a systematic review of clinical studies

  • By

  • Ekaterina Lazhovska

  • Kristina Drusany Starič

  • Katrina Mencin

  • Marina Jakimovska

  • March 23, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To comprehensively assess and compare clinical outcomes across electrosurgical modalities in gynecologic cancer surgery, highlighting their importance in improving surgical outcomes.

Key Findings:
  • 359 publications reviewed; 10 met inclusion criteria, plus 1 additional publication found during reference review.
  • Most studies focused on cervical cancer (36.4%) and both cervical and endometrial cancer (27.3%).
  • Advanced electrosurgical devices were evaluated in 82% of studies.
  • LigaSure was the most commonly used advanced device.
Interpretation:

Advanced electrosurgical devices generally show better perioperative outcomes, but effectiveness varies by cancer type and surgical procedure, with implications for clinical practice.

Limitations:
  • Heterogeneous study designs and outcomes limit the generalizability of findings.
  • Limited number of studies specifically comparing electrosurgical devices in oncological settings may affect the robustness of conclusions.
Conclusion:

Further well-designed studies with standardized outcome measures are needed to better assess the effectiveness of electrosurgical instruments in gynecologic cancer surgery, particularly in specific cancer types.

Original Source(s)

Related Content