Naturally Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Vs Non-Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy, Two Years Follow up, Controlled Clinical Trial - Summary - MDSpire

Naturally Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Vs Non-Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy, Two Years Follow up, Controlled Clinical Trial

  • By

  • Alaa M Sewefy

  • Tamer E Esmaeel

  • Ahmed M Kamal

  • April 6, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of using a natural band (Teres ligament or omental flap) in sleeve gastrectomy to prevent gastric pouch dilatation and weight regain over a two-year follow-up period, specifically testing the hypothesis that natural banding improves weight loss outcomes compared to standard LSG.

Key Findings:
  • Natural banding resulted in better weight loss outcomes compared to non-banded LSG, with a statistically significant difference in %TWL and %EWL.
  • Gastric pouch dilatation was minimized in the banded group, as evidenced by measured gastric volumes.
  • Complication rates were low and comparable between both groups, with no significant adverse events reported.
Interpretation:

The use of a natural band in sleeve gastrectomy may enhance long-term weight loss and reduce complications associated with gastric pouch dilatation.

Limitations:
  • The study was conducted at a single center, which may limit generalizability to broader populations and different clinical settings.
  • Follow-up duration was limited to two years, which may not capture long-term outcomes and potential late complications.
Conclusion:

Natural banding during sleeve gastrectomy appears to be a promising technique to improve weight loss and reduce complications, warranting further studies for validation, particularly focusing on long-term outcomes beyond two years.

Original Source(s)

Related Content