Impact of Weight Bias, Stigma and Discrimination on Physical, Mental, and Quality of Life Outcomes of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review - Summary - MDSpire
Advertisement
Impact of Weight Bias, Stigma and Discrimination on Physical, Mental, and Quality of Life Outcomes of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review
To systematically review the impact of pre- and post-operative weight bias, stigma, and discrimination on physical and mental health outcomes, as well as quality of life in adult patients who underwent metabolic and bariatric surgery, emphasizing the systematic nature of the review.
Key Findings:
Weight stigma persists post-surgery, affecting mental health and healthcare engagement, with specific studies referenced for each finding.
Interpretation:
The review highlights the significant negative impact of weight stigma and discrimination on the health and quality of life of individuals undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery, suggesting that addressing these issues is crucial for improving patient outcomes, with practical recommendations for clinical settings.
Limitations:
The review may be limited by the availability of studies that specifically measure weight stigma and its effects post-surgery, and potential biases in the included studies may affect the generalizability of the findings, including selection and reporting biases.
Conclusion:
Addressing weight stigma and discrimination is essential for enhancing the effectiveness of metabolic and bariatric surgery and improving the overall well-being of patients.
by Eugenia Romano, Ximena Ramos Salas, Lucia Alonso Diez, Ida Camperchioli, Chiara Gerardi, Violeta Moize, Ken Clare, Silvia Frusone, Francesco Maria Carrano
A long-term cohort study found that obesity was not associated with worse patient-reported outcomes or higher reoperation rates following total ankle replacement in optimized surgical candidates.
