The article examines the objective, findings, and clinical context described in Assessing Primary Care’s Core Contributions: Continuity, Trust, and Stewardship.
Approach:
Value dashboard: Proposes assessing whether patients can obtain care, receive recognition and guidance, and experience treatment that improves quality of life.
Candidate measures: Identifies patient-reported measures of access, continuity, trust, coordination, goals, and treatment burden, including the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure and NCQA’s Person-Centered Outcome Measures.
Implementation: Recommends initially using routine measurement for learning and quality improvement, with possible evaluation in hybrid and population-based payment models.
Key Findings:
Primary care contributes through access, continuity, trust, coordination, comprehensiveness, and stewardship, including work that occurs between visits or prevents unnecessary care.
Common health-system metrics often fail to capture these functions, although instruments for continuity and treatment burden have advanced.
Existing measurement efforts remain fragmented, and the article identifies questions about their use in care improvement, payment, and accountability.
Interpretation:
The article argues that measuring patient-centered outcomes could make primary care’s relational and stewardship functions more visible. It notes that measurement alone will not resolve workforce shortages, underinvestment, fragmented delivery, or misaligned payment.
Limitations:
The article does not report original empirical results or compare the performance of the proposed measures.
The supplied text ends mid-sentence, so the article’s final remarks are unavailable.
Harold Burstein, MD, PhD, and Rachel Freedman, MD, MPH discuss the results of a new study looking at the impact of food access and poverty on patients with metastatic breast cancer. They also discuss the new Dana-Farber food pantry and patient navigators who help coordinate care.