To investigate the impact of local factors and perceptions on the acceptance and application of urolithiasis guidelines in Turkey, emphasizing the significance of these local factors.
Key Findings:
Key findings include that 40.9% of respondents perform over 20 stone-related procedures monthly, highlighting the active engagement of urologists in this area. Additionally, 48.9% reported no formal education on guideline use, indicating a significant gap.
Interpretation:
The study highlights a gap in formal education on guidelines among urologists and varying levels of guideline adherence based on practice settings, which could affect patient outcomes.
Limitations:
The survey did not seek ethical committee approval due to anonymity and professional opinion focus, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Responses may be biased based on self-reporting.
Conclusion:
The acceptance and application of urolithiasis guidelines in Turkey are influenced by local factors, with a significant portion of urologists lacking formal training on their use, underscoring the need for targeted educational initiatives.
